Thursday, July 26, 2012

Planned parenthood death by doctor whats the difference again just the age.

You mean the mother is supposed to live? But we are and abortion clinic, you pay us to eliminate members of your family. We must have misunderstood you. We were just doing you a service by making sure you had less mouths to feed. NO one person is more important to us than the next. I got carried away with my dismemberment of life and limb I couldnt tell where the child ended and the mother began its no my fault they were attached, How could you expect me to know the difference between one persons flesh and another. My job is to remove flesh from the womb  I only did what you paid me for. It was a two for one deal. Kill a baby and the mother is free. I am not belittling the death of this women who would have been a mother. I am bringing the two to light. Shining some truth in the lies. If we are to undermine the life of one why not the other. If this offends you maybe its time to take a real hard look at what abortion is. Abortion is ceasing another to live out there time her on earth. Otherwise known as death. If the infant was treated as the mother then they are either to both be important and valued or both to be insignificant and disposable. The bottom line is this mother as all the ones who died before here and were not in the news. She put a price tag in her unborn child A price tag as to how much she was willing to pay to kill the child. That is horrible just as the statement above is horrible They are both the same. either life is important or it isn't. 






IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

 Were is that right for the unborn child? Who is fighting for them? Is the loss of a women sad? Yes, not nearly as sad as the loss of all the unborn we will never get to meet. She went into that place willingly. She had a choice she made a bad one. Am I sad for the death of a women who chose to kill another. NO I am not. sorry if that feels harsh to anyone out there but It feels harsh to me that anyone would want to kill anyone let alone an unborn child. Her death was preventable. Her death was of her own making. Her death was result of her concious actions. I never feel for a sky diver who knew the risks. I always feel for the victim of a random shooting who did not feel there were any chance of death in a coffee shop or a movie theater. I will not be seeing any movies in the near future or going anywhere public and crowded or loud. But I am not a risk taker. The only risk I take are with my heart. I am not against anyone to takes other risk I will just not feel sorry for anyone who puts themselves in front of a train then cannot understand why they were smashed by it. Seems obvious to me. Someone shoves sharp instruments into your body to remove the body you have created there might be a risk you could die too. Well you knew you did it you died. With family support to keep the baby or give him/her up for adoption she might still be alive today to talk about it. That is not the choice the entire family made and that is something they will have to live with forever. If you do not want a baby do not have sex or have a surgery done to remove the change of getting pregnant. Get on the pill and use other contraceptives if you cannot keep your legs closed. And yes I practice what I preach. I have only had sex with one man in the last 8 years. It will stay that way until someone proves themselves worthy waits another year for a proper engagement and marries me. Until then no one gains entry. Period. 

No comments:

Post a Comment